<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intimidation of Climatoligists Questioning Global Warming Continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/</link>
	<description>Where The Old Media Meets The New</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pundit Review &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New York Times finds room to cover Holocaust Deniers</title>
		<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-219522</link>
		<dc:creator>Pundit Review &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New York Times finds room to cover Holocaust Deniers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/23/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-219522</guid>
		<description>[...] Good for the New York Times for writing an article about the increasingly vocal group of scientists who are saying &#8220;Enough! with the global warming alarmism&#8221;. One thing missing from the article is any mention of the intimidation that scientists who have spoken out have received from politicians. To see what I mean, click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Good for the New York Times for writing an article about the increasingly vocal group of scientists who are saying &#8220;Enough! with the global warming alarmism&#8221;. One thing missing from the article is any mention of the intimidation that scientists who have spoken out have received from politicians. To see what I mean, click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global-Tepiding? &#187; Superheroes of the Global Tepiding Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-199928</link>
		<dc:creator>Global-Tepiding? &#187; Superheroes of the Global Tepiding Movement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/23/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-199928</guid>
		<description>[...] Pundit Review Â» Blog Archive Â» Intimidation of Climatoligists Questioning Global Warming Continues Another politician is silencing a climatologist for daring to question global warming. Weâ??ve seen this story before, in Virginia and Oregon. Now itâ??s Delawareâ??s turn. The message being delivered by these politicians is quite clear, DO NOT QUESTION GLOBAL WARMING OR YOU WILL BE PUNISHED.Iâ??ll say it again, global warming is not about science, itâ??s a political movement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pundit Review Â» Blog Archive Â» Intimidation of Climatoligists Questioning Global Warming Continues Another politician is silencing a climatologist for daring to question global warming. Weâ??ve seen this story before, in Virginia and Oregon. Now itâ??s Delawareâ??s turn. The message being delivered by these politicians is quite clear, DO NOT QUESTION GLOBAL WARMING OR YOU WILL BE PUNISHED.Iâ??ll say it again, global warming is not about science, itâ??s a political movement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David R.Beaupre</title>
		<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-199561</link>
		<dc:creator>David R.Beaupre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/23/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-199561</guid>
		<description>Hey Kevin,
 Great posting!These what I call EnvironMental Cases cannot prove their point without making it a political cause as it is with the American political socialist movement.
 Tell me how can there be Global Warming experts when they cannot come up with a logical explanation or proof that man made global warming exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin,<br />
 Great posting!These what I call EnvironMental Cases cannot prove their point without making it a political cause as it is with the American political socialist movement.<br />
 Tell me how can there be Global Warming experts when they cannot come up with a logical explanation or proof that man made global warming exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-198162</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/23/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-198162</guid>
		<description>Optimist,

I just finished watching Al Gore's movie.  I am astonished at the credibility it has.  It was weak, weak, weak.  It was more about Al Gore than global warming.  It is eye candy for the intellectually lazy.

My main point is this, the issue is open for debate as to the causes, extent and cure for any global warming that there may be. The absolute certainty of these fanatics is akin to a religious belief.  It is nonsense. The intimidation of experts who disagree is a disgrace.  

Thanks for the comment.

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Optimist,</p>
<p>I just finished watching Al Gore&#8217;s movie.  I am astonished at the credibility it has.  It was weak, weak, weak.  It was more about Al Gore than global warming.  It is eye candy for the intellectually lazy.</p>
<p>My main point is this, the issue is open for debate as to the causes, extent and cure for any global warming that there may be. The absolute certainty of these fanatics is akin to a religious belief.  It is nonsense. The intimidation of experts who disagree is a disgrace.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Optimist</title>
		<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-198094</link>
		<dc:creator>The Optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/23/intimidation-of-climatoligists-questioning-global-warming-continues-apace/#comment-198094</guid>
		<description>Kevin:

Delaware has a climatologist? 

And you are a hundred percent right that the people doing this witchhunt should be ashamed of themselves. The whole situation is just pathetic. 

My thoughts on global warming: The global warming debate is just like being on a jury for a medical malpractice case. One side brings in brilliant experts that say "Black." The other side brings in brilliant experts that say "White." And the jury, none of whom are doctors, have to choose between two experts. Unwillable battle for most us. So I am going to ignore the entire subject because both sides have PHDs. 

Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin:</p>
<p>Delaware has a climatologist? </p>
<p>And you are a hundred percent right that the people doing this witchhunt should be ashamed of themselves. The whole situation is just pathetic. </p>
<p>My thoughts on global warming: The global warming debate is just like being on a jury for a medical malpractice case. One side brings in brilliant experts that say &#8220;Black.&#8221; The other side brings in brilliant experts that say &#8220;White.&#8221; And the jury, none of whom are doctors, have to choose between two experts. Unwillable battle for most us. So I am going to ignore the entire subject because both sides have PHDs. </p>
<p>Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
