Comments on: My Response to Senator Conrad In Today’s Wall St Journal http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/ Where The Old Media Meets The New Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:11:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Pundit Review » Blog Archive » Liar Liar Pants on Fire http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-240118 Pundit Review » Blog Archive » Liar Liar Pants on Fire Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:55:45 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-240118 [...] I posted this letter on the blog Feb 27,2007 the exact day that my letter to the editor was published in the Wall St. Journal and received this comment from a reader - we’ll refer to as “Mr. Personality” who goes by the very covert name of “bnkpm.” He’s a very secretive and bitter guy. “…I notice that you changed the version of your letter that you posted here to remove the “lowest in 30 years” lie, but the WSJ already published it. Slick move, liar.” [...] [...] I posted this letter on the blog Feb 27,2007 the exact day that my letter to the editor was published in the Wall St. Journal and received this comment from a reader - we’ll refer to as “Mr. Personality” who goes by the very covert name of “bnkpm.” He’s a very secretive and bitter guy. “…I notice that you changed the version of your letter that you posted here to remove the “lowest in 30 years” lie, but the WSJ already published it. Slick move, liar.” [...]

]]> By: Pundit Review » Blog Archive » Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-239946 Pundit Review » Blog Archive » Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:03:05 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-239946 [...] I posted this letter on the blog Feb 27,2007 the exact day that my letter to the editor was published in the Wall St. Journal and received this comment from a reader - we’ll refer to as “Mr. Personality” who goes by the very covert name of “bnkpm.” He’s a very secretive and bitter guy. “…I notice that you changed the version of your letter that you posted here to remove the “lowest in 30 years” lie, but the WSJ already published it. Slick move, liar.” [...] [...] I posted this letter on the blog Feb 27,2007 the exact day that my letter to the editor was published in the Wall St. Journal and received this comment from a reader - we’ll refer to as “Mr. Personality” who goes by the very covert name of “bnkpm.” He’s a very secretive and bitter guy. “…I notice that you changed the version of your letter that you posted here to remove the “lowest in 30 years” lie, but the WSJ already published it. Slick move, liar.” [...]

]]> By: Administrator http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-237900 Administrator Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:58:56 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-237900 I knew that a loud mouth like you would not have the guts to wager any money on it or have the guts to reveal your identity. You are quick to accuse others of being a liar. But when push comes to shove and somebody like me calls you on it, you fold like a cheap suit. I will post the exact printed edition of my letter to the editor on our blog and will at least expect an apology from you and an admittence that you were wrong in accusing me of omitting any words from the original print version. But I won't hold my breath. I know you are not capable of intellectual honesty or humility. You sound like an angry and very bitter person. I hope you get well soon Mr. "liar liar pants on fire." Gregg I knew that a loud mouth like you would not have the guts to wager any money on it or have the guts to reveal your identity. You are quick to accuse others of being a liar. But when push comes to shove and somebody like me calls you on it, you fold like a cheap suit. I will post the exact printed edition of my letter to the editor on our blog and will at least expect an apology from you and an admittence that you were wrong in accusing me of omitting any words from the original print version.

But I won’t hold my breath. I know you are not capable of intellectual honesty or humility. You sound like an angry and very bitter person. I hope you get well soon Mr. “liar liar pants on fire.”

Gregg

]]> By: bnkpm http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-237874 bnkpm Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:20:47 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-237874 HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Just shut up and post the letter, you lying coward. And don't try any Photoshop monkey business either, because I have the means of catching that. Put up or shut up. No more grandstanding, no more tough-guy bluster, no more stalling. Just post it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Just shut up and post the letter, you lying coward. And don’t try any Photoshop monkey business either, because I have the means of catching that.

Put up or shut up. No more grandstanding, no more tough-guy bluster, no more stalling. Just post it.

]]> By: Gregg Jackson http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-236908 Gregg Jackson Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:54:07 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-236908 Let me remind you that you called me a liar and accused me of omiting words from the original print version of the Wall St. Journal. If you are so sure that I omitted the words you have publically accused me of omitting than surely you will be willing to wager some money (I proposed 100K but am willing to wager as much as you would like)on it. You have called me every name in the book because you lact the requisite proof to substantiate your false claim. I will most the print version tomorrow. But first I think you owe it to everybody who has had to listen to your puerile rantings to put your money where your mouth is. So I will ask you again if you will wager the money? That's how we will "resolve" it. Gregg Let me remind you that you called me a liar and accused me of omiting words from the original print version of the Wall St. Journal. If you are so sure that I omitted the words you have publically accused me of omitting than surely you will be willing to wager some money (I proposed 100K but am willing to wager as much as you would like)on it. You have called me every name in the book because you lact the requisite proof to substantiate your false claim. I will most the print version tomorrow. But first I think you owe it to everybody who has had to listen to your puerile rantings to put your money where your mouth is.

So I will ask you again if you will wager the money? That’s how we will “resolve” it.

Gregg

]]> By: bnkpm http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-236763 bnkpm Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:16:14 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-236763 Well, now you're lying about lying, and lying about lying about lying, which makes you a compulsive pathological liar, just like your lyin' buddies Ann, Sean, Bill and Rush. You said: "I will post the original article from the Wall St. Journal on the blog to prove that you are a liar and a moon bat." So where is it? If you're so confident that you can show the world what a liar and moon bat I am, surely you'd post it prominently on the front page of your blog, right? But you won't, because you're a liar and a coward. And cut the "give me your name" and "$100k bet" grandstanding. That's all pompous bloviation and a pathetic diversion and you know it. Just post a scan of the letter and the matter will be resolved, and you will be shown to be a compulsive pathological liar, just like your lyin' buddies Ann, Sean, Bill and Rush. C'mon, coward - POST IT! Well, now you’re lying about lying, and lying about lying about lying, which makes you a compulsive pathological liar, just like your lyin’ buddies Ann, Sean, Bill and Rush.

You said:

“I will post the original article from the Wall St. Journal on the blog to prove that you are a liar and a moon bat.”

So where is it? If you’re so confident that you can show the world what a liar and moon bat I am, surely you’d post it prominently on the front page of your blog, right? But you won’t, because you’re a liar and a coward.

And cut the “give me your name” and “$100k bet” grandstanding. That’s all pompous bloviation and a pathetic diversion and you know it.

Just post a scan of the letter and the matter will be resolved, and you will be shown to be a compulsive pathological liar, just like your lyin’ buddies Ann, Sean, Bill and Rush.

C’mon, coward - POST IT!

]]> By: Administrator http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-235856 Administrator Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:47:31 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-235856 Now everybody knows who the "liar" was during this whole escapade. Get a life. Gregg Now everybody knows who the “liar” was during this whole escapade. Get a life.

Gregg

]]> By: Administrator http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-228374 Administrator Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:24:29 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-228374 By the way, you can scan my letter to the editor from the original version of Wall St. Journal dated Fed 27,2007 as I suggested you do in our last exchange and post it on the internet. You have the "right" to do that. You don't need my permission. And if you do, I am giving you permission to do so. So, go ahead and scan and post my letter to the editor and prove me wrong. You won't because you can't. The original letter to the editor from the print edition is exactly the same as the one I posted on line. You seem like one angry and bitter individual. Don't you have anything better to do with your time than falsely accuse people of things? I'll be wiating to hear back from you about identifying yourself and putting your money where your mouth is. Gregg By the way, you can scan my letter to the editor from the original version of Wall St. Journal dated Fed 27,2007 as I suggested you do in our last exchange and post it on the internet. You have the “right” to do that. You don’t need my permission. And if you do, I am giving you permission to do so. So, go ahead and scan and post my letter to the editor and prove me wrong. You won’t because you can’t. The original letter to the editor from the print edition is exactly the same as the one I posted on line.

You seem like one angry and bitter individual. Don’t you have anything better to do with your time than falsely accuse people of things?

I’ll be wiating to hear back from you about identifying yourself and putting your money where your mouth is.

Gregg

]]> By: Administrator http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-228356 Administrator Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:17:31 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-228356 I will post the original article from the Wall St. Journal on the blog to prove that you are a liar and a moon bat. Will you be man enough to identify yourself and put the proposed $100,000 on it publically? I would think that such a wager would be easy money for you since you are so sure that I omitted the words "lowest in 30 years" from the original print edition of my letter to the editor. Willing to put your money where your mouth is? Gregg I will post the original article from the Wall St. Journal on the blog to prove that you are a liar and a moon bat.

Will you be man enough to identify yourself and put the proposed $100,000 on it publically? I would think that such a wager would be easy money for you since you are so sure that I omitted the words “lowest in 30 years” from the original print edition of my letter to the editor.

Willing to put your money where your mouth is?

Gregg

]]> By: bnkpm http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-224333 bnkpm Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:12:46 +0000 http://www.punditreview.com/2007/02/27/my-response-to-senator-conrad-in-todays-wall-st-journal/#comment-224333 HAHAHAHAHAHA! what a liar you are. If I had the rights to post a scan of your letter on your blog, I would, and expose you as a liar. But I don't have such rights. How convenient for you - again. But since YOU have the rights to post such a scan on your blog, why don't you and prove me wrong? You won't, because you know I'm telling the truth and you are lying. And all the pompous grandstanding in the world won't change that. As far as the productivity growth is concerned, read this article, which says: "On Mar. 6, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that nonfarm business productivity rose by only 1.6% in 2006, its smallest gain since 1997. And more bad news was buried deep in the report: Productivity gains for 2005 and 2004 were revised down as well." http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_12/b4026060.htm Oh, and by the way: resorting to namecalling ("bitter partisan bomb throwing moron") is the clearest indicator that one has been "busted" and has lost the argument. I'm done with you, liar. HAHAHAHAHAHA! what a liar you are.

If I had the rights to post a scan of your letter on your blog, I would, and expose you as a liar. But I don’t have such rights. How convenient for you - again.

But since YOU have the rights to post such a scan on your blog, why don’t you and prove me wrong? You won’t, because you know I’m telling the truth and you are lying. And all the pompous grandstanding in the world won’t change that.

As far as the productivity growth is concerned, read this article, which says:

“On Mar. 6, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that nonfarm business productivity rose by only 1.6% in 2006, its smallest gain since 1997. And more bad news was buried deep in the report: Productivity gains for 2005 and 2004 were revised down as well.”

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_12/b4026060.htm

Oh, and by the way: resorting to namecalling (”bitter partisan bomb throwing moron”) is the clearest indicator that one has been “busted” and has lost the argument.

I’m done with you, liar.

]]>