<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo to Senator &#8220;We&#8217;ve Lost In Iraq&#8221; Reid:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.punditreview.com/2007/08/memo-to-senator-weve-lost-in-iraq-reid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/08/memo-to-senator-weve-lost-in-iraq-reid/</link>
	<description>Where The Old Media Meets The New</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Vierling</title>
		<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/08/memo-to-senator-weve-lost-in-iraq-reid/#comment-765283</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Vierling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditreview.com/2007/08/28/memo-to-senator-weve-lost-in-iraq-reid/#comment-765283</guid>
		<description>I agree with Doug. Looks like Andress left out some important items about his experience and qualifications that are relevant for any work with the taxpayers' money. He writes well and has a great spin but again whose interest is he looking out for? In what context? Examine his past and this maybe a better indicator of what he is up to in Iraq.

Regardless of the messenger, we can agree with much of this.

Check  some other posts:
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/12/contractor-combatant-carter-andress.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Doug. Looks like Andress left out some important items about his experience and qualifications that are relevant for any work with the taxpayers&#8217; money. He writes well and has a great spin but again whose interest is he looking out for? In what context? Examine his past and this maybe a better indicator of what he is up to in Iraq.</p>
<p>Regardless of the messenger, we can agree with much of this.</p>
<p>Check  some other posts:<br />
<a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/12/contractor-combatant-carter-andress.html" rel="nofollow">http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/12/contractor-combatant-carter-andress.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam</title>
		<link>http://www.punditreview.com/2007/08/memo-to-senator-weve-lost-in-iraq-reid/#comment-486473</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 02:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditreview.com/2007/08/28/memo-to-senator-weve-lost-in-iraq-reid/#comment-486473</guid>
		<description>In trying to expose media bias, you should always be more than clear about the source of any article.

I won't judge the truth of the article, but I must take into account the possible bias (probable bias?). The article was written by a representative of a company that has undertaken $150m of contracts in Iraq (according to their Web site). I would take from there that they have a fiduciary interest in prolonging the contractor presence.

That is not to say that there is anything wrong  in what the person wrote, but it is irresponsible to read such articles without the context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In trying to expose media bias, you should always be more than clear about the source of any article.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t judge the truth of the article, but I must take into account the possible bias (probable bias?). The article was written by a representative of a company that has undertaken $150m of contracts in Iraq (according to their Web site). I would take from there that they have a fiduciary interest in prolonging the contractor presence.</p>
<p>That is not to say that there is anything wrong  in what the person wrote, but it is irresponsible to read such articles without the context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
