Posted by Gregg on Jan 30, 2006 @ 14:27

Last night on Pundit Review Radio, State Rep. Ted Spiliotis (D-Danvers) was kind enough to join us in studio to discuss House Bill 1641 “An Act to Provide Health Education in Schools.” The bill is nothing but a sop to Planned Parenthood and the radical homosexual lobby whose fingerprints are all over this treacherous piece of legislation. Rather then spending time and tax payers’ money devising new ways to indoctrinate pre-schoolers, our elected representatives should read this article from today’s Wall St. Journal by Gov. Jeb Bush entitled “Five Rules for School Reform.” (subs req.)Given the fact that Mass education ranks toward the bottom in student achievement and graduation rates nationally especially among minorities trapped in failing goverment run schools, the reps responsible for drafting HB 1641 should be ashamed of themselves that they are so focussed on teaching transgenderism 101 to 4-year olds instead of solving the real problems facing our children in this state:

The governor lays out five rules that our legislators should emulate:

The first rule is that when you run for office, you need to say what you’re going to do and then do what you said you would. Candidates who aren’t willing to take political risks won’t take the policy risks required to drive real change.

By taking a stand during our campaign, my running mate and I gave voters a chance to examine and debate our plan to transform Florida schools. As a result, our election came with a mandate to implement a comprehensive education reform based on high standards and expectations, clear measurement and accountability, and rewards and consequences for results

The second rule of reform is that if you don’t measure, you don’t care. You have to be willing to measure the outcome of reform and to let the world know what the real results are — the ones you’re proud of and the ones that show more work is needed.

Today, 53% of Florida students are reading at or above grade level, up from 46% in 2001. That’s 161,000 more students with this critical skill. Our graduation rate is up from 60% to 72%, our drop-out rate is down by half, and our students are making greater learning gains than their national counterparts. The biggest gains are being made by our minority students as they close the achievement gap more each year.

The third rule is that big reforms require long-term commitment. We’ve been testing 4th grade reading since the 1998-99 school year. At that time, only 51% of our 4th graders could read at grade level — two years later, the number had risen to just 53%. Now that our education reforms have been in place for six school years, 71% of all Florida 4th graders have the ability to pick up a book and read it independently. It’s the cumulative effect of incremental improvement that creates significant progress.

Another rule — the fourth — is to communicate what you’re doing, especially to parents. Education reform can only be sustained when families know it’s working. Florida gives parents a comprehensive report card tracking their child’s performance year-over-year, along with the school’s performance against state and national standards and explanations of each.

The fifth rule is that success is never final and reform is never finished. You are either in ascendance or decline, so if you aren’t moving forward you are losing ground as well as opportunities for students.

This year, Florida will introduce the largest reform package since the sweeping changes we made in 1999.

These reforms include differentiated pay and performance-based pay for teachers to attract and retain talented educators in critical subject areas, encourage them to teach in economically challenged schools and reward them for improving student performance.

For critics who claim that private choice voucher programs are ineffective the governor provides this info:

Researchers from the Manhattan Institute, Harvard and Cornell have independently studied Florida’s private school choice programs. All three studies concluded that the threat of vouchers actually creates the greatest improvement in struggling schools. Given the choice between losing students and raising the quality of education, schools rise to the challenge and make tremendous gains.

Memo to Rep. Wolf (Alice Wolf of Cambridge who is the author of HB 1641) and the rest of the liberals at the state house who are endorsing this legislation:

We elected you to reform education not use our children for your sick social experiments. Scrap the sexual indoctrination and teach our kids how to read, write, and reason effectively so they can compete in the global marketplace. That’s the the best way to achive a high standard of living and good “health.”

Filed in: Politics, Uncategorized |
4 Comments »
  1. The fourth rule makes a lot of sense when it comes to this bill: “Another rule â?? the fourth â??is to communicate what youâ??re doing, especially to parents. Education reform can only be sustained when families know itâ??s working.” I think most parents with children from K-5 can agree that teaching little Johnie and Suzie about homosexuality and how men and women sodomize each other does not work effectively in society and ‘know it’s (not) working’. Why we need to “educate” our children about dangerous behaviors is beyond me. Don’t they get enough of this on Desperate Housewives and MTV? Why do we need to teach what people choose to do and believe in? If that is going to be the case why can’t schools teach about the teachings of God in public schools? Do not give me any argument that their is such a thing as the separation of church and state because their is no such thing!
    Just like what you said Gregg, if we are to teach our kids effective learning skills to compete in the global marketplace I am not sure how learning about a dangerous choice in life is going to help our kids get ahead. Yes, I will teach my children to love and accept all but to LEARN about a behavior. How is this even considered learning? What are my children going to learn about? Diversity? Acceptance? Tolerance? These seem to be the particular kind of social skills that the parents impose onto their children, not the school committee and Planed Parenthood. Folks, our rights as child rearers is being attacked here not the gay communitity who wants to propigate their political agenda on our precious children in a time of a cultural war with traditional marriage. This is agenda based, PERIOD! We must not let our children be exposed to such radical and dangerous ideas. Parents such as David Parker are believers of the ABC’s and the 123’s not indocrination so the glorification of a certain behavior leads to the destruction of marriage in Massachusetts. Don’t be fooled. Look between the lines and see that the radicals behind this piece of legislation are attacking “it all starts at home” theory and want to convert that to “it all starts at school without any parental involvement.”
    On January 31, the Joint Committee on Education will hear testimony on House Bill 1641 called the “Massachusetts Comprehensive Health Curriculum Framework,” The MA Comprehensive Health Curriculum Framework relies on Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts (PPLM) and the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network (GLSEN) as resources. House Bill 1641 is a top priority of PPLM! This bill makes this new expanded curriculum a mandatory requirement for graduation for children in grades Pre-K through 12, statewide in Massachusetts. The hearing starts at 1pm, be there at 12pm, in room B2 of the Statehouse. Those who want to testify, please contact the Massachusetts Catholic Conference, Catholic Citizenship, or MCFL as soon as possible for further information (see contact information* below). Others, who are not prepared to testify, are urged to attend the hearing on behalf of parents’ rights, as their presence will be a tremendous boost! Please come. If you absolutely cannot come, please find a parent who can come or who can write a letter that can be entered as testimony.

    * Contact Information
    Massachusetts Catholic Conference
    Phone 617-367-6060
    (fax) 617-367-2767
    (e) staff@macathconf.org
    * Catholic Citizenship
    Larry Cirignano, 617-755-7668
    Bea Martins, 508-678-3351
    * MA Citizens For Life
    617-242-4199; Ext. 227 or 221

    Comment by Michael - Andover — January 30, 2006 @ 11:00 pm


  2. I think a huge point that is often overlooked is that sex education, if you have it, should cover health of sex organs. So, for example, a diagram of the uterus and an explanation of menstruation would be appropriate to help girls understand the biology of their bodies. My sex education covered just these topics, and no more, and even then only the students with signed forms from their parents were allowed to attend.

    Sexuality education is entirely different. This is where sexual behavior comes in to play. This is also where religion comes into play, and this bill’s efforts to make standard a very, very secular attitude is an imposition of secularism over and against religion. Secularism can technically be a religion, and thus this violates the Constitutional freedom from state-mandated religion. Parents should have the right to pull their children from any secular training on sexuality. Menstruation? That sounds more okay to me–I’d let my kids attend that class. Homosexuality and permissive attitudes about premarital sex through birth control advice should be relegated to the Home.

    I attended sex education with the permission of my parents at school, where I learned about periods and the importance of abstinence. I attended sexuality education at my church WITH my parents. This, I think, was an incredibly healthy way to understand both my body in a biological sense and my sexuality as a God-given gift, to be used only in fitting ways.

    No school in my home state of Kansas could ever have gotten away with not only forcing students to attend sex ed but also weaseling in sexuality education. Massachusetts seems to stomp all over the rights of its religious citizens in the name of…wait, secularism has no god but itself. So, MA seems to push these things for no real reason but a sense of entitlement. My husband calls this behavior “bullying.” I’m inclined to agree.

    Comment by Christine Yantis Hargrove — January 31, 2006 @ 8:24 pm


  3. Great blog you have going on. KarlaX

    Comment by KarlaX — April 25, 2006 @ 9:18 pm


  4. td car insurence…

    adjuster beacon Osiris Arlington nominated:compacting …

    Trackback by td car insurence — September 22, 2007 @ 3:24 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment



























Subscribe with Bloglines

Add to My Yahoo!

msn

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe with myFeedster


Design by:

Blog Design by E.Webscapes

Managed by:

tla