First thing, hats off to the Secret Service and everyone involved in law enforcement. An uneventful day from a secuirty perspective.
As for the entire day, it was a great one for the country. We now have a black president and perhaps more importantly, a black first family. The Obama’s seem like the prototypical American family, happily married parents who clearly love each other and are raising their children with all the care and love required. The fact that they are an intact black family sends a powerful message to that community which has been devastated by several generations of fatherlessness.
The inauguration ceremonies at the Capitol left a lot to be desired. When the music is the highlight of the event, that’s a problem. It started with the classless Obama supporters booing President Bush when he was introduced. Several other things from the event were at odds with what Obama has been telling us he is all about. For starters, Rev. Lowrey’s invocation had an unfortunate closing.
Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around … when yellow will be mellow … when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. That all those who do justice and love mercy say Amen.
The inauguration ceremony was the wrong setting. Obama is supposed to be above that stuff. And for the record, it was white folks who got Barack Obama elected president because they judged him by the content of his character and not the color of his skin. When I think of the racial implications of yesterday, I think first of the black senior citizens of Rev. Lowrey’s generation who have lived through such an incredible arc of history. Too bad Rev. Lowrey seems not to have noticed how much things have changed since his days with Dr. King.
The stumbling over the oath seemed to me to be entirely Chief Justice Roberts fault. I couldn’t help but wonder if Roberts was punking Obama at bit for not voting to confirm him. Truthfully, I think it was a simple case of nerves.
The Obama speech was a major disappointment. He got the somber tone and call to action right. That’s about it. I thought Obama was bringing Americans of all political stripes together. I thought this was the time for solutions, not the politics of division? Instead, the speech was filled with cheap shots at the Bush administration. Those were beneath him and the moment. Beyond that huge sections of the speech sounded like standard campaign boilerplate.
The speech left me thinking about two America’s, the one I’ve been living in and the one Obama was describing. For example,
Obama, who says the scientific debate about the climate is “over” talked about “restoring science to its rightful place.†What a joke. Here is the quote of the day, Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan,
CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another. … Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so.
Stifling debate on global warming climate change and demonizing dissenters is hardly restoring science to its rightful place.
Speaking of dissent, is it still patriotic now that Bush is back in Texas?
Obama also said “we are ready to lead once moreâ€. WTF is he talking about? What does he think America has been doing since September 11, 2001? We’ve been leading the free world in its fight against radical Islam. Thanks to George W. Bush, the United States has taken the fight to the enemy on all corners of the globe, and we have left Al Qaeda in shambles for the Obama administration. That is in sharp contrast to what Bush inherited from Clinton, a fully formed global organization operating freely around the world and striking American interests at will and without consequence.
Again, when Obama said that we must “no longer ignore the suffering outside our bordersâ€, I had to wonder which America he’s been living in. Jay Nordlinger at NRO asked,
“In fact, one of the biggest criticisms of Bush is that he has gone too far in trying to alleviate the suffering of others — “imposing our values†and all that. And will Obama better Bush’s Africa program? Fat chance.”
Indeed.
As for the evening portion of the festivities, the only thing I saw was the Obama’s first dance, to AT LAST sung by the talented and beautiful Beyonce Knowles. When I awoke at 5am this morning I was wondering about the Obama’s and how tired they must have been last night. A long day that is scripted down to the second, filled with stress and excitement, a parade and having to attend ten balls last night. This morning, President Obama meets with Gen. Petraeus. It really is a job like no other.
Despite my criticisms of the speech and certain aspects of the inauguration, overall a great and historic day for the country. Obama has inspired millions of Americans. He has more goodwill in the tank than any incoming president I can think of. Now it is up to him to use it wisely. The time for talk is over. For the first time in his life, Barack Obama will be judged because of what he does and not what he says. I wish him well.
Getting the Capitol ready for today’s big event, these pictures were taken about six weeks ago during a brief vist to our nation’s capital,
Under construction, the presidential viewing stand for inaugural parade, in front of the White House,
Obama has decided to go all things Lincoln for his inauguration , and I’m not about to argue with that. When he takes the oath at noon today, he will be using the Lincoln inaugural bible. Perhaps the only bible with more significance in American political history is this one, the George Washington inaugural bible, used in the very first inauguration, in New York City, 1789,
It is always a pleasure to welcome back to Pundit Review Radio retired Lt. Col. Ralph Peters. Last night we talked about the myriad of foreign policy challenges facing soon-to-be President Obama. Some of the topics touched on in this 35 minute discussion include Israel-Hamas, the future of Iraq, Afghanistan and NATO, resurgent Russia and the one country that Obama will not be able to avoid a conflict with. You’ll be surprised to hear who it is.
What is Pundit Review Radio?
Pundit Review Radio is where the old media meets the new. Each week we give voice to the work of the most influential leaders in the new media/citizen journalist revolution. Called “groundbreaking†by Talkers Magazine, this unique show brings the best of the blogs to your radio every Sunday evening from 8-10 pm EST on AM680 WRKO, Boston’s Talk Station.
Bruce McQuain from QandO joined us once again for Someone You Should Know, our weekly tribute to the troops. Bruce is a veteran of the Vietnam war and spent 28 years in the U.S. Army. He brings a perspective and understanding to these stories that we could never match.
Tonight Bruce told us about Marine Corporal Jason S. Clairday,
the Marine Corps awarded the Navy Cross medal — the second-highest for valor in combat — to his widow during a Camp Pendleton ceremony as members of 3rd Battalion, 5th Marines, looked on.
Clairday is the 17th Marine to receive the Navy Cross for his individual actions in combat in Iraq or Afghanistan, and he is the sixth member of 3/5 awarded the medal for Iraq — the most service crosses of any unit so far…
The Someone You Should Know radio collaboration began as an extension of Matt Burden's series at Blackfive. Bruce McQuain from QandO does an incredible job with the series every week.
What is Pundit Review Radio?
Pundit Review Radio is where the old media meets the new. Each week we give voice to the work of the most influential leaders in the new media/citizen journalist revolution. Called “groundbreaking” by Talkers Magazine, this unique show brings the best of the blogs to your radio every Sunday evening from 8-10 pm EST on AM680 WRKO, Boston’s Talk Station.
Meet the very attractive Mrs. Lorrie Sullenberger!
Way to go Chesley!
Here is video of the incredible water landing, it starts at the 2 minute mark,
Miracles are things that cannot be explained. This was no miracle. This was the result of the training, decision making and skill of Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger and the entire crew, as well as the actions of the passangers. This was the result of dozens of people making good decisions under extreme duress. Their courage and decision making are the reason for the happy ending. Calling this a miracle sells it short.
Any post relating to the health of Apple CEO Steve Jobs has to start with two obligatory statements, he is a business genius, and I wish him a speedy recovery.
Now, with that out of the way, my focus will return to Apple’s long-standing, troubling and somewhat distant relationship with the truth.
Last night’s disclosure from Steve Jobs should not come as a surprise. Jobs and Apple have a long history of misleading the public.
Apple, the company that touts its care and committment to the environment, the comapny that has planet saver Al Gore on its board. Problem is, environmental groups say that Apple has the worst environmental record in the information technology sector. That’s one example. Here’s another.
Today’s news is a major reversal from only a week ago, when Jobs issued a statement downplaying any concerns about his health.
Apple CEO Jobs backtracks on health, takes leave
SEATTLE—Apple Inc. co-founder and Chief Executive Steve Jobs said Wednesday he is taking a medical leave until June, even though just a week ago the cancer survivor tried to assure investors and employees his recent weight loss was caused by an easily treatable hormone deficiency.
Yes, there is an ethical line that Jobs and Apple are walking here. As a human being, Jobs has a right to privacy with regard to his health. As a CEO who is considered indespensible to his company, Jobs has an obligation, legal or otherwise, to keep investors informed about his condition. I’m not a securities lawyer, but it is clear from all the chatter about Jobs health, that the company is walking a fine line between his rights and those of his shareholders. Here is an interesting interview with New York Times business columnist Joe Nocera, who says Steve Jobs cannot be trusted!
The problem for Jobs and Apple is that the company has a history of dispensing misinformation (see above), if not outright lies (keep reading).
Back in 2006, controversy around Jobs was not health related, but ethics related. Jobs and others within Apple (and his other company Pixar for that matter) were accused of backdating stock options. How did Jobs and Apple handle the issue? In a way that would make a state rep. blush. As I said at the time,
Apple did what everyone caught with their hand in the cookie jar does, they appointed a blue ribbon panel to investigate.
The chair of this panel, none other than Apple board member Al Gore. How convenient. Miraculously, despite the preponderance of evidence, the Gore panel absolved Jobs of any wrongdoing. I know, your shocked, shocked. Me too. For me, this was yet another example of Al Gore’s Rotten Apple.
The question for Apple shareholders today is, what should they believe? With Apple, it is hard to know where the marketing and showmanship ends and the truth begins.
Geithner Questioned on Tax Returns
WASHINGTON — Timothy F. Geithner, President-elect Barack Obama’s choice for Treasury secretary, failed to pay more than $34,000 in federal taxes over several years early this decade, and also faces questions about the employment papers of a former household employee, suddenly complicating what had seemed to be an easy confirmation process in the Senate
Allahpundit says,
The real objection to Geithner isn’t back taxes, it’s the fact that the financial collapse happened on his watch as head of the New York Fed.
Powerline says, “payment of self-employment taxes is elementary” while Instapundit says this is a great arguement for tax simplification.






