WMDs found in Iraq!!!!!!!!!!!
It was only a matter of time that WMDs, that everybody liberal Democrat including virtually every high ranking Democrat official from Clinton to Gore to Kerry acknowledged Saddam possessed, would be uncovered.
Every claim by the domestic insurgent liberal Defeaticrats have been debunked.
“No connection between Sadaam and Al-Qaeada”
“War for Oil”
“Saddam had nothing to do with 9-11/Not part of real war on terror”
“Bush knew about 9-11.”
and now the biggest myth of all that there were no WMDs in Iraq and that we rushed to war has been proven to be wrong too.
This type of abysmal track record on areas of national security/international relations is why we must never elect a Democrat president. Period.
The U.S. has located some 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003 with more
likely to be found, according to two Republican members of Congress
trumpeting a newly declassified portion of a government report.“We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons,” Sen.
Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said at an afternoon news conference.Santorum read from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground
Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, which noted:
“Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons
munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many
efforts to locate and destroy Iraq’s pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled
and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist.”
June 24th, 2006 at 2:58 pm
You people are truly off the deep end. Read the entire story,
“One senior Defense Department official told Fox News the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions. ”
Why are you so much in favor of a failed strategy? I was for the Iraq War, but this is a massive fumbling by Bush
June 24th, 2006 at 6:22 pm
John,
Whether the weapons they found were in “usable” condition now is really irrelevant isn’t it? I love how you Bush hating libs change the goal posts after each one of your absured claims is debunked (in this case Saddam never had wMDs) The fact that he had them and was concealing them from weapons inspectors proved he had them. Given the fact that he did and had used them on his pown people coupled with the fact that just about every major intelligence organization confirmed that he was in the process of developing his WMD programs added to the fact that Clinton CIA appointee Tenet told Bush Saddams’s posessing WMDs was a “slam dunk” (which has now been confirmed)was Bush supposed to ignore this intelligence?
You were “for the Iraq war” john? If you were then what the heck are you talking about? If you were, why are you questioning the condtion of chemicals and biological toxins which have been burried for close to 3 years? I’d be interested to hear you rationale for supporting the Iraq War.
Also, what “massive fumbling” are you speaking of? No military plan is without error especially against an enemy we have never faced and given the domestic insurgents (liberal Dems) exposing our top secret surveylence plans to the Al Qaeda etc…
We probably could have fought a more aggressive campaign and no doubt should have secured Bagdhad sooner and embarked upon inspections in Syria, closed border to inhibit inflow of Iranian Al Qaeda and IEDs emanating from Iran, but to now, on the verge of what many would consider to be a historical breakthrough in the middle east, your charcterizing the Iraq War as “a massive fumbling by Bush” is not a fair or accurate assessment. All you do John is criticize. No balanced perspective from you ever, just criticism of Bush and kooky theories of how the Neo-cons are trying to control the world.
BTW, it is you John, with all due respoect, are the conspiracy theorist who is “off the deep end.” We are still waiting for even one of you whacked out theories to come true. you let us know when one does. Keep commenting. It’s good entertainment for me personally:) Great humor.
Gregg
June 26th, 2006 at 3:44 pm
That was a different John commenting, Gregg. It wasn’t me - the one you’re used to answering.
June 26th, 2006 at 4:52 pm
Oh, and just so you know it wasn’t me, I was NOT for the Iraq war or any other war that has ever been fought for that matter.
June 26th, 2006 at 7:19 pm
John, So, we should have let the Nazis run rough-shod over the rest of the world?
Gregg
June 27th, 2006 at 10:50 am
The Nazis were largely created and funded by a group collectively known as The Illuminati or Committee of 300. The war was scripted.
June 27th, 2006 at 9:05 pm
John, As far as I am concerned, you have nothing meaningful to add to any discussion. I am offended as a Jew who had relatives murdered by the Nazis. There was nothing “scripted” by the fact they were burned in ovens. As far as i am concerned John you can take your innane comments elsewhere. Have you ever thought to start your own blog? Perhaps it is time.
Gregg J
July 1st, 2006 at 7:10 pm
what secrets are beign exposed? Are you speaking of the New York Times that printed stories about the tracking of terror finances, the same program (SWIFT) that has been mentioned by various White House officials, including Bush, since 9-11. Bush even mentioned it in his state of the union, (or “state of…or speech to the nation, whatever you want to call it”-Bush)
Stop crying about “LIBS” or “DEFEATACRATS” or whatever you call them.
I find it funny that you are stand up for a President that said he doesn’t even think of Bin Laden, doesn’t know where he is, then during a debate with Kerry said he NEVER said it.
Yes, All war plans are flawed and mistakes are made, but never before has an administration failed to re-adjust.
You’re still posting about direct connections with Iraq and 911, when everyone knows there was no direct link, any connection is happenstance.
Your theroys are weak minded, your assertions are ridiculous.