Tyranny Rears Its Head In the Birthplace of Liberty
Tyranny Rears Its Head In the Birthplace of Liberty
Gay Bullies Prove They Rule The Puritan State
GrassTopsUSA Guest Commentary
By Gregg Jackson
07-02-07
Founding father John Adams thought America would last about 200 years. Well, perhaps he was off by about 31 years, but a sign appeared a few weeks ago in America’s Cradle of Liberty (Massachusetts) that might make him a prophet after all.
The lawmakers’ vote in the birthplace of American Democracy to redefine morality – i.e. to legitimize homosexual marriage in the Puritan State – may signal the end of American Democracy. The vote is a new Declaration of Independence – not against a tyrannical imperial king – but against the Creator, who founded America.
The Democrat legislature in the Cradle of Liberty deprived citizens of the fundamental principle of Democratic government by denying citizens the right to vote on homosexual marriage. In this act, Adam’s legislature transformed itself into the same type of arrogant imperial government Adams and the colonists revolted against. The legislature’s tyranny is more outrageous and destructive than what the colonists faced. Twenty days before July 4, 2007 your Cradle of Liberty became, officially, the Test Tube of Totalitarianism.
Rest of my Article Here
Law, Mass. State Politics | Gregg | 
July 3, 2007 3:20 pm
Gregg,
This is way over the top. The state constitution has a process for dealing with ballot initiatives. It leaves a lot to be desired, but the process was followed, the legislature voted and your side lost. That’s not tyranny by any stretch of the imagination. Ours is a representative democracy. Our representatives voted and not enough of them supported putting this question on the ballot.
If you believe the polls, they followed the will of the people in this state. I too wish it made it to the ballot, so I could have voted for it. I have always felt that it would win at the ballot box. That would end this debate, or would it? It should.
Either way, the legal process for ballot initiatives was followed, period.
Kevin
Kevin
As they say in the Navy Gregg “well done.”
You have articulately described the devestating effects gay fascism has already inflicted upon Massachusetts. This act of tyranny is like a mile-wide tornado. Every part of society has already been infected by it including increased bullying of Christians, losses of religious freedom, and government intrusion into the day to day activities of religious organizations. The gay activists keep saying it’s been years already and you see the sky has not fallen. Nice try, but in one way they are right. This de facto “law” which is still not on the books and all the contorted, and convuluted efforts of the corrupt legislators still hasn’t changed anyone’s mind. Most people still think homosexuality is strange, perverted, unnatural, highly unusual, and contradicts God’s desires for us to live fruitfully.
Kevin, My article was “way over the top” huh?
As I have stated on numerous occasions, yes the legislators followed the constitutionally proscribed process and voted in the Con Con as they are legally bound to do. I have always acknowledged that.
What I have said repeatedly however is that the legislature acted tyrannically by essentially enshrining into law an activist ruling from the judiciary which ordered the legislature to change the wording of the marriage statutes to accomodate same sex marriage. Since the legislature never did that then the marriage statute should have remained what it had always historically been understood to be- a legal union between one man and one woman.
So yes, the legislature by not fulfilling their obligation as handed down from the MSJC to change the statute, essentially allowed the MSJC to re-wirte marriage law from the bench- a jurisdiction that the court does not possess. So you basically had the MSJC finding a “right” for same sex couples to marry in the state constitution written by John Adams. And then you had the legislature not change the actual statute as it was ordered to do by the MSJC and then denying the right of the people to define the law as is our right. So, the tyranny occured when the legislature by not allowing the people via a vote to amend the state constitution, after, by doing nothing, essentially enshrined an activist ruling of the MSJC into law. I call that tyranny. You may call it something else.
And I doubt very much that the Dems would have fought so hard to keep this off the ballot if it would have been shot down. Even liberal Oregon by 58% voted to reject gay marriage as has every other state by even larger margins. I believe that it would have passed by a significant margin. And something tells me that the gay lobby and Democrats like Deval who twisted arms and promised all sorts of goodies to pols considering changing their votes knew it too.
Gregg
“The Cradle of Liberty is now the Cradle of American Fascism.”
Dictionary definition of Fadscism, “a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Yes, I said over the top.
“The legislature’s tyranny is more outrageous and destructive than what the colonists faced.”
Yes, I said over the top.
“Twenty days before July 4, 2007 your Cradle of Liberty became, officially, the Test Tube of Totalitarianism.”
Words have meaning.
“a totalitarian regime crushes all autonomous institutions in its drive to seize the human soul”- Arthur M.Schlesinger, Jr. Given what transpired, and what that word means, yes, I said over the top.
“The vote is a new Declaration of Independence – not against a tyrannical imperial king – but against the Creator, who founded America.”
“Up to the last 40 years, most Americans have believed this is a God-formed nation.”
“…allow this rebellion against the God who founded America”
A God formed nation? That’s news to me. What does that mean? Did God create America out of whole cloth? God, the Creator, is mentioned in the frequenly by the Founders, but this country was founded by men, not God. Yes, I said over the top.
“The Democrat legislature in the Cradle of Liberty deprived citizens of the fundamental principle of Democratic government by denying citizens the right to vote on homosexual marriage.”
Again, we live in a representative democracy. Every important issue doesn’t get to go before the public for a vote. There is a process to get a question on the ballot, it was followed, the legislature voted, end of story. It just didn’t work out the way you wanted. Nobody was denied anything. The constitutionally perscribed process was followed.
As for the arm twisting of pro-marriage equality politicians like Deval, how dare he practice politics!
“Funny. That’s exactly what the communists do when they takeover a country: silence critics.”
You have no evidence that Camenker’s radio program was taken off the air because of this, do you? It’s not like he’s a multi-issue guy, if they didn’t want his anti-gay agenda on the air, he never would have gotten on in the first place. He’s a one issue zealot.
As for you, you have a blog and a radio show, I don’t think you are being silenced, nor is anyone else. Yes, I said over the top.
I just think such, dare I say, over-the-top language takes away from the message you are trying to communicate.
Kevin
2007 chevrolet camaro car insurance quote…
exponential:repetitious safest:Austria tasteless …
lana lotts fucked…
When Cailey Taylor lotts lana fucked lotts fucked lana prn. Fucked lotts lana nicole promote participate?! …